//
you're reading...
Events & Meetings, Penal excess

What are we aiming for?

In late November 2012 a newly formed steering group met to begin outlining the parameters, goals, name and programme of work for a new collaboration of 80+ campaigners, activists, academics, trade unionists, practitioners and people affected by the criminal justice system. This is just the start of a process and further dates are now set for 2013 to maintain momentum for this essential work to offer a new voice in the public debate about the overuse of criminal justice and the need for a dialogue about social justice and harm in society.

Our aims are:

  1. To campaign for a radical reduction in the size and scope of criminal justice.
  2. To promote genuine alternatives to criminal justice processes and social inequalities.
  3. To advocate for social justice solutions rather than punishment as a response to social problems, inequalities and harm.

What we call this new collaboration is still up for discussion with ‘Reclaiming justice’ and ‘Campaign against penal excess’ (CAPE) currently on the table. Let us know what you think – comment on the bottom of this post or email penalexcess@crimeandjustice.org.uk.

Discussion

5 thoughts on “What are we aiming for?

  1. I think that ‘Reclaiming Justice’ is a much better title than anything to do with reducing penal excess, because penal excess is more likely to be reduced when there is more across-class equality before the law. Problem though with ‘Reclaiming Justice’ is that it implies that there is [or ever was] an ideal justice to be claimed. What about ‘The Justice and Equality Project ‘ ie working on a justice and equality agenda? (But think a more snappy title would be better…no ideas at moment)

    Posted by Pat Carlen | December 11, 2012, 11:44 am
    • I agree that Reclaiming Justice does not fully cover the aims of the collaboration, but has public appeal, which is important. I think of it more in terms of reclaiming the justice agenda.

      Posted by Sacha Darke | December 21, 2012, 8:21 am
      • How do you know that? (Just interested.) And even it has more public appeal, maybe ‘the public’ is ready for something new – like linking justice with equality rather than crime?

        Posted by Pat Carlen | December 21, 2012, 2:54 pm
  2. I firmly believe that restorative justice and conflict resolution are central to achieving your aims!

    Posted by Criminonymous | January 3, 2013, 1:22 am
    • Hi Criminonymous, Well, I guess a lot of people would agree with you (though I don’t think I do) but can you explain WHY you think that? (Because restorative justice takes many forms, and I’m not sure what you mean by conflict resolution either – for example,do you mean within communities? or between rich and poor? or between warring nations?) Pat Carlen

      Posted by Pat Carlen | January 3, 2013, 10:55 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Articles by month

Articles by category

Reclaim Justice Network Facebook Page

Follow us on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: